Community Care Dispute Solicitors

A local authority that refuses to meet an assessed care need, unlawfully withdraws care services, or fails to carry out a proper assessment is acting in breach of its statutory duties. A solicitor will hold the authority to account.

Community care law — primarily the Care Act 2014 — imposes significant statutory duties on local authorities to assess the care and support needs of adults and carers, and to provide or commission services that meet those needs where the person lacks the financial or personal resources to provide for them. Local authorities frequently fail in these duties — carrying out inadequate assessments, setting eligibility thresholds that are too high, failing to meet assessed needs, or withdrawing services without proper reassessment. A solicitor will advise on the adult's rights, challenge the authority's decision by complaint, and — where necessary — by judicial review in the High Court.

Care needs assessments & appeals Unlawful withdrawal of services Direct payments & personal budgets Free initial consultation

Community Care — Legal Rights & Challenge Routes

Community care disputes — the decisions most commonly challenged and the legal framework that governs them.

The Care Act 2014 creates specific statutory duties for local authorities — not mere powers. Where those duties are not performed, the adult or their carer has a right to challenge the authority's failure. A solicitor will identify the specific duty and the most effective challenge route.

✓

Care Act 2014 — the duty to assess and meet needs

Under s.9 Care Act 2014, a local authority must carry out a needs assessment of any adult who appears to have care and support needs — regardless of the authority's view of the level of those needs or whether the authority will ultimately fund the care. Under s.18, where an adult has eligible care and support needs and meets the financial threshold (or chooses to self-fund), the authority must meet those needs. Failing to carry out a needs assessment, carrying out an inadequate assessment that understates the person's needs, or failing to provide the care and support required to meet eligible needs is a breach of the Care Act duty. A solicitor will challenge the authority's failure to assess or meet needs — by complaint, ombudsman referral, or judicial review.

✓

Eligibility thresholds — challenging unlawful restriction of access to services

The Care Act specifies a national eligibility threshold — care needs are eligible where they arise from a physical or mental impairment or illness, and where the adult is unable to achieve two or more specified outcomes (maintaining personal hygiene, maintaining a habitable home environment, preparing food and drink, maintaining relationships) as a result of that impairment. Local authorities that set eligibility thresholds higher than the national threshold — by creating additional local criteria or by interpreting the national criteria too narrowly — are acting unlawfully. A solicitor will challenge an eligibility determination that does not correctly apply the national threshold — by requesting a reassessment, complaining to the LGSCO, or pursuing judicial review.

✓

Unlawful withdrawal or reduction of care services

Where an adult is receiving care and support services and the local authority proposes to withdraw or reduce those services, it must first carry out a fresh needs assessment and a review of the care and support plan — not simply impose cuts without reassessment. Withdrawal of care services without proper reassessment is unlawful — and may also engage Article 8 ECHR (the right to respect for private and family life) where the withdrawal has a significant impact on the adult's dignity, autonomy, and quality of life. A solicitor will challenge the withdrawal of services — requiring the authority to carry out a proper reassessment, maintain the current services pending the outcome, and — where the reassessment is inadequate — pursuing judicial review.

✓

Direct payments and personal budgets — challenging inadequate funding

Direct payments are payments made to an eligible adult to enable them to arrange their own care and support services — rather than receiving services arranged by the local authority. A personal budget sets out the amount the local authority considers it needs to spend to meet the adult's eligible care needs. Where the direct payment or personal budget is insufficient to meet the adult's eligible needs — because the local authority has calculated the cost incorrectly, used standard rates that do not reflect the adult's actual support needs, or applied the wrong eligibility criteria — the adult can challenge the adequacy of the payment. A solicitor will advise on the correct personal budget calculation, challenge any inadequate payment, and pursue the complaint or judicial review.

✓

Carer's needs — the duty to assess and support carers

The Care Act 2014 also imposes a duty on local authorities to assess the needs of carers — adults who provide or intend to provide care for another adult. Where the carer has eligible needs (needs that arise from the caring role and that affect the carer's wellbeing), the authority has a duty to meet those needs. Carers' support — practical help, respite care, financial assistance — is frequently inadequate or entirely absent. A solicitor will advise on the carer's rights under the Care Act, challenge any inadequate carer's assessment, and ensure the authority meets its duty to support the carer in a way that enables them to continue caring and maintain their own wellbeing.

✓

Residential care and NHS Continuing Healthcare — funding disputes

Where an adult has care needs that meet the criteria for NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC), the NHS — not the local authority — is responsible for funding the full cost of the care package. Many adults who are entitled to CHC funding are incorrectly assessed as not eligible — leaving the local authority or the individual to fund care that should be NHS-funded. A solicitor will review the CHC decision, identify whether the assessment process was correctly followed, challenge the eligibility decision, and pursue a retrospective CHC assessment for periods of care that should have been NHS-funded — potentially recovering significant sums for the individual or their estate.

How It Works

Community care law gives adults and carers specific legal rights — not aspirations. Where the local authority fails to meet those duties, a solicitor will hold it to account and secure the support the person is legally entitled to.

A solicitor will advise on the adult's and carer's rights under the Care Act, challenge the local authority's assessment, funding decision, or failure to act by complaint and — where necessary — judicial review in the High Court.

Submit Your Request
1

Tell us about the community care dispute

Describe the person's care needs, the local authority's decision or failure to act, and what support the authority is refusing to provide or has withdrawn.

2

Solicitor advises on rights and the challenge

A community care specialist advises on the legal duties owed by the local authority, identifies the most effective challenge route, and manages the complaint or judicial review process.

3

Free initial consultation

You receive clear advice on the community care dispute and how to enforce the local authority's duties — at no cost and no obligation.

Free Initial Consultation

The right to community care is a legal right — not a favour the local authority can grant or withhold according to its budget. A solicitor will ensure the authority meets its statutory duties to the adult who needs care.

Get specialist community care dispute advice — and find out how to challenge the local authority's failure to properly assess and meet the care needs of an adult or carer.

Challenge This Care Decision

Common Questions

Community care disputes — what people ask us.

My relative's care package has been cut without reassessment. Is this lawful?

No — where an adult is receiving care and support under the Care Act 2014 and the local authority proposes to reduce or withdraw the care package, it is legally required to carry out a fresh needs assessment and to review the care and support plan before making any change. It cannot simply impose cuts without reassessment — to do so is a breach of the Care Act duty and potentially a breach of Article 8 ECHR (the right to private and family life). A solicitor will write to the local authority requiring it to carry out a reassessment before implementing the cuts, and — where the authority refuses or carries out an inadequate reassessment — pursue judicial review to quash the reduction and require the authority to carry out a lawful reassessment.

The local authority says my care needs are not eligible under the Care Act. What can I do?

Challenge the eligibility decision — first by requesting a review of the needs assessment, then by complaining to the LGSCO where the review is inadequate, and finally by judicial review where the authority has applied an unlawfully high eligibility threshold. A solicitor will review the needs assessment for legal errors, identify whether the national eligibility criteria were correctly applied, and challenge the decision through the most appropriate route. The Care Act imposes a national threshold — local authorities cannot set a higher local threshold. Where the assessment fails to identify all the outcomes the person is unable to achieve, or applies an unduly restrictive interpretation of "unable to achieve" an outcome, the eligibility decision is wrong and can be challenged.

My parent qualifies for NHS Continuing Healthcare but has been assessed as not eligible. What can we do?

Request a review of the CHC eligibility decision — the process involves a local NHS Clinical Commissioning Group (ICB) review and, if that fails, an Independent Review Panel (IRP) hearing. Where the IRP upholds the ineligibility finding, the family can challenge the decision by judicial review in the Administrative Court. Retrospective CHC assessments can also be requested where a person received care in the past (including care home fees paid privately or by the local authority) and should have qualified for CHC — the NHS will reassess eligibility for past periods and, if CHC is found, must repay the care costs (up to the NHS standard rate). A solicitor will manage the CHC challenge process and, where appropriate, the retrospective review.

What is the difference between community care from the local authority and NHS Continuing Healthcare?

Community care is funded by the local authority under the Care Act 2014 — subject to a financial means test (the adult's assets and income). NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC) is funded entirely by the NHS — with no means test — where the adult's care needs are primarily health needs (rather than social care needs) and arise from a complex or unpredictable health condition. The distinction is important: community care is means-tested and the individual may have to contribute to or fully fund their own care; CHC is free at the point of need. The CHC eligibility assessment uses the National Framework for CHC — assessing the nature, intensity, complexity, and unpredictability of the person's care needs. A solicitor will advise on whether the person should qualify for CHC and challenge an incorrect eligibility decision.

Related Public Law & Judicial Review Topics

View all →

Latest Articles

Quick Links