Tax Tribunal Appeals — Key Stages
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the process for appealing an HMRC tax decision to the First-tier Tribunal?
The appeal process typically has four stages: (1) Notify HMRC of the appeal within 30 days of the decision — this is essential, and a late appeal requires a good reason; (2) Request statutory review (TMA 1970 s.49B) — an internal HMRC review by a review officer; HMRC has 45 days to complete the review; (3) If the review upholds HMRC's decision, notify the First-tier Tribunal of the appeal within 30 days of the review conclusion letter; (4) Tribunal proceedings — case management conference, exchange of documents and witness statements, Tribunal hearing, and decision. At any stage, HMRC ADR may be requested to resolve the dispute without a hearing. A solicitor manages each stage of the process and advises on the best route.
What is statutory review and do I have to request it before going to the Tribunal?
Statutory review (TMA 1970 s.49B) is an internal HMRC review of the decision by a review officer not involved in the original decision. It is not mandatory — a taxpayer may bypass statutory review and notify the appeal directly to the First-tier Tribunal (TMA 1970 s.49D). However, statutory review is often worthwhile: it is free, relatively quick (45 days), and may result in HMRC upholding the taxpayer's position without the time and cost of Tribunal proceedings. Where the dispute is primarily factual, a statutory review may result in a negotiated outcome. Where the dispute is a question of law, statutory review is less likely to produce a result — in those cases, notifying the Tribunal directly may be the better route. A solicitor advises on whether statutory review is the right approach for the specific dispute.
Can I have the tax on a disputed assessment postponed while the appeal is pending?
Yes — a taxpayer can apply to HMRC (or to the First-tier Tribunal if HMRC refuses) to postpone the tax charged by an assessment while the appeal is pending (TMA 1970 s.55). The taxpayer must apply for postponement and show reasonable grounds for the appeal. HMRC and the taxpayer agree the amount of tax to be postponed (typically the amount by which the taxpayer claims the assessment is excessive) — the agreed amount does not have to be paid until the appeal is determined. If HMRC disagrees with the postponement amount, the Tribunal determines the amount to be postponed. A solicitor advises on whether postponement is appropriate and prepares the grounds for the application.
Is HMRC ADR suitable for my tax dispute?
HMRC ADR is most suitable where the dispute involves factual matters — for example, valuation disputes, apportionment of expenses between business and private use, or disputes about the facts of a particular transaction. It is less suitable where the dispute turns entirely on a question of law, because the ADR mediator cannot bind either party on a legal point. ADR is not suitable where HMRC alleges fraud or deliberate conduct. ADR is confidential and without prejudice — anything said or offered in ADR cannot be referred to in subsequent Tribunal proceedings. Where ADR produces an agreed settlement, both sides sign a legally binding settlement agreement. Where agreement cannot be reached, the Tribunal appeal continues from where it left off. A solicitor advises on whether ADR is appropriate and prepares the position paper.
When can I appeal a First-tier Tribunal decision to the Upper Tribunal?
A First-tier Tribunal decision may be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) on a point of law only — the First-tier Tribunal must have made an error of law in its decision. An error of law includes: misapplying the law to the facts; failing to give adequate reasons for its decision; taking into account irrelevant matters or failing to take into account relevant matters; or reaching a decision that no reasonable tribunal properly directing itself could have reached. Permission to appeal is required — the application must first be made to the First-tier Tribunal (within 56 days of the written decision), and if refused, to the Upper Tribunal itself. A solicitor advises on whether an arguable error of law exists and manages the Upper Tribunal proceedings.