HMRC Tax Investigation Solicitors
An HMRC investigation is not a routine audit. It is a formal legal process with serious consequences — including tax assessments, penalties, interest, and in fraud cases, criminal prosecution. The information you provide from day one shapes the outcome.
HMRC conducts tax investigations under various powers — the self-assessment enquiry (s.9A TMA 1970), the civil investigation of fraud (Code of Practice 8), and the most serious civil fraud investigation (Code of Practice 9), under which the taxpayer is given the opportunity to make a full disclosure in exchange for immunity from criminal prosecution. Each type of investigation requires a different legal strategy. A solicitor will advise on the nature of the investigation, the scope of HMRC's information-gathering powers, the information that must and need not be provided, and the most effective route to resolving the investigation with the minimum tax and penalty exposure.
HMRC Investigation Types & Legal Issues
HMRC tax investigations — the different types of investigation and what legal advice is required at each stage.
The type of HMRC investigation determines the powers HMRC has, the information the taxpayer must provide, and the legal strategy most likely to achieve an early and cost-effective resolution. A solicitor will assess the investigation and advise from the first contact.
Self-assessment enquiry (s.9A TMA 1970)
HMRC can open a formal enquiry into any self-assessment return within 12 months of the filing date. The enquiry opens with a notice specifying the period under investigation. HMRC can then request information and documents by issuing an information notice (Schedule 36 Finance Act 2008). A solicitor will assess the scope of the enquiry, advise on what information is required to be provided, and respond strategically — minimising the information provided and the tax and penalty exposure. Where the enquiry is taking too long, a solicitor can apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a closure notice, requiring HMRC to bring the enquiry to a conclusion within a specified period.
Code of Practice 8 — civil investigation of suspected fraud
A COP 8 investigation is HMRC's civil investigation into cases where HMRC suspects serious tax fraud or avoidance but has not yet decided whether criminal prosecution is warranted. COP 8 is conducted by HMRC's Fraud Investigation Service. The taxpayer is interviewed under caution, and the interview record is used in any subsequent assessment or prosecution. A solicitor will attend all interviews, advise on whether the taxpayer is required to answer specific questions, manage the disclosure process, and negotiate the tax and penalty settlement where the investigation concludes without criminal prosecution. COP 8 investigations can result in significant assessments covering many years — a solicitor's early involvement is essential to limit the exposure.
Code of Practice 9 — Contractual Disclosure Facility
A COP 9 investigation is HMRC's most serious civil investigation — issued where HMRC has formed a reasonable suspicion of fraud. The taxpayer is offered the Contractual Disclosure Facility (CDF): make a complete disclosure of all deliberate tax fraud and HMRC will not pursue criminal prosecution. Rejecting the CDF (by denying fraud) removes the immunity — HMRC is free to investigate and, if the evidence supports it, prosecute. Making a CDF disclosure that is incomplete is treated as a criminal matter. A solicitor is essential from the moment the COP 9 notice arrives — the decision whether to accept or reject the CDF, and the management of any disclosure made, are high-stakes legal decisions with criminal prosecution consequences.
Worldwide Disclosure Facility and offshore tax
The Worldwide Disclosure Facility (WDF) is HMRC's current disclosure opportunity for taxpayers with offshore income or assets not previously reported — bank accounts, rental income from overseas property, offshore investments, and offshore trusts. Making a WDF disclosure before HMRC identifies the undeclared income or assets reduces the penalty rate significantly. Failure to disclose, and failure to correct (FTC) penalties, can reach 200% of the unpaid tax for the most serious offshore non-compliance. A solicitor will advise on the extent of the disclosure required, prepare and submit the WDF disclosure, and negotiate the penalty with HMRC — minimising the financial cost of regularising the position.
Schedule 36 information notices — challenging HMRC's requests
HMRC has wide-ranging powers to require the production of documents and information under Schedule 36 Finance Act 2008. An information notice can require the taxpayer to produce documents and provide information reasonably required for checking the tax position. However, HMRC's information-gathering powers have limits — certain documents are legally privileged (communications with a solicitor), certain information is protected (personal data about third parties), and HMRC cannot request information that is not "reasonably required". A solicitor will assess each Schedule 36 notice, advise on which requests are within HMRC's powers, challenge notices that exceed those powers by appeal to the First-tier Tribunal, and manage the response to ensure compliance without over-disclosure.
Tax settlement negotiations — minimising penalties
Most HMRC investigations conclude with a civil settlement — a negotiated agreement on the additional tax due and the penalty. The penalty rate depends on the behaviour (reasonable care, careless, deliberate, deliberate and concealed), the extent of the disclosure (prompted or unprompted), and the quality of the disclosure. For prompted disclosure of deliberate behaviour, the penalty range is 35–70% of the unpaid tax. For unprompted disclosure of the same, it is 20–70%. For deliberate and concealed behaviour, the ranges are higher. A solicitor will present the most compelling case for the lowest penalty, demonstrate the quality of the taxpayer's cooperation, and negotiate the settlement to the most favourable outcome achievable.