IR35 & Off-Payroll Dispute Solicitors
An HMRC IR35 investigation can result in years of unpaid income tax and National Insurance being collected from the contractor's personal service company — or from the engager, under the off-payroll working rules. A solicitor will challenge the status determination and manage the dispute.
IR35 (the "Intermediaries Legislation") taxes contractors who work through their own personal service company (PSC) as if they were employees of the engager — where the working arrangements are such that, in the absence of the PSC, the contractor would be a deemed employee. The off-payroll working rules (Chapter 10 ITEPA 2003), introduced for the public sector in 2017 and extended to medium and large private sector engagers from April 2021, shift the obligation to assess IR35 status to the engager — not the contractor. An incorrect status determination — whether by the contractor or the engager — results in PAYE and NIC liability. A solicitor will challenge the status determination and manage the dispute with HMRC.
IR35 & Off-Payroll Disputes — Key Issues
IR35 disputes — the legal tests for employment status, the off-payroll rules, and how disputes with HMRC are resolved.
IR35 status assessments are among the most contested areas of HMRC's enforcement activity. The legal tests for deemed employment are complex and fact-specific — a solicitor will identify the arguments that support outside-IR35 status and pursue them compellingly through the appeal process.
The IR35 status tests — control, substitution, and mutuality of obligation
IR35 status is assessed by applying the employment status tests — primarily: control (whether the engager has the right to direct how, where, and when the work is done); substitution (whether the contractor has a genuine right to send a substitute in their place); and mutuality of obligation (whether the engager is obliged to offer work and the contractor is obliged to accept it). No single factor is determinative — the test is the overall picture of the working arrangements. A solicitor will analyse each factor in detail against the contract terms and the actual working arrangements, identify the strongest arguments for outside-IR35 status, and present them to HMRC and the First-tier Tribunal.
HMRC IR35 investigations — the PSC as the primary target
Under the original IR35 rules (Chapter 8 ITEPA 2003 — still applicable to small private sector engagers), the contractor's personal service company is responsible for the IR35 assessment and for paying any PAYE and NIC that arises if the arrangement is within IR35. HMRC's IR35 investigation team opens enquiries into PSC corporation tax returns, challenges the IR35 status assessment, raises PAYE and NIC assessments on the PSC, and charges interest and penalties. A solicitor will manage the IR35 investigation from the first enquiry notice — challenging HMRC's status determination, presenting the evidence of the actual working arrangements, and pursuing the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal where HMRC's position is incorrect.
Off-payroll working rules — engager compliance and status determination statements
For medium and large private sector engagers (and all public sector engagers), the off-payroll working rules require the engager to assess the IR35 status of each worker engaged through a PSC and to issue a Status Determination Statement (SDS). Where the SDS determines "inside IR35", the engager (or the fee-payer in the supply chain) must deduct PAYE and NIC from the contractor's fee. A contractor who disagrees with the SDS can raise a formal dispute under the Client-Led Disagreement Process — requiring the engager to review the determination. A solicitor will advise on the disagreement process, draft the formal challenge to the SDS, and manage the dispute with the engager and, if necessary, HMRC.
CEST — HMRC's Check Employment Status for Tax tool
HMRC's Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool produces a status determination for a specific set of factual inputs. HMRC has stated that it will stand behind CEST results — but only where accurate information is entered. The CEST tool has been criticised for failing to consider mutuality of obligation (a key employment status test) and for producing "inside IR35" results in cases where the courts have found the contractor to be outside IR35. A solicitor will assess whether the CEST result correctly reflects the actual working arrangements, identify where the CEST inputs were inaccurate or incomplete, and present the correct status assessment — supported by a detailed analysis of the relevant employment status case law — to HMRC and the tribunal.
IR35 PAYE assessments — challenging the amount of the liability
Where HMRC determines that an engagement is within IR35, it raises a PAYE assessment on the PSC for the income tax and NIC not deducted from the deemed employment payment. The deemed employment payment is calculated as the gross fee income less the 5% expenses allowance (repealed from April 2023 for off-payroll cases), salary already paid, employer's NIC, and pension contributions. The assessment can cover multiple years — going back up to 6 years (20 years for fraud). A solicitor will challenge both the status determination (arguing the engagement is outside IR35) and, if the status determination is upheld, the calculation of the deemed employment payment — ensuring the assessment does not exceed the actual liability.
IR35 at the First-tier Tax Tribunal — how appeals are decided
IR35 status appeals at the First-tier Tribunal are decided on the balance of probabilities — the tribunal must determine what the actual working arrangements were and whether, applying those arrangements to the employment status tests, the contractor is a deemed employee. The contract terms are relevant but not decisive — where the actual working arrangements differ from the contract, the tribunal gives weight to the actual arrangements. A solicitor will prepare the case for the tribunal — witness statements from the contractor and the engager (or the contractor's clients), documentary evidence of the actual working arrangements, and a detailed analysis of the status tests applied to the specific facts. IR35 appeals that are properly prepared and presented are more likely to succeed than those pursued without legal representation.